Annoyed

I’m so tired of people, including the President, suggesting we not ‘jump to conclusions’ and pointing out that a lot of the report is hearsay and other ‘unreliable’ evidence. Yes, in some cases, there probably would not be enough evidence to convict someone. But, when did that become a standard in a report? We have to prove, beyond a reasonable doubt, that these things occurred before we can issue a report stating baseball has trouble with steroids?

Please.